FOR-PDs
Reading Strategy of the Month
Adopted and Adapted by Dr. Vicky Zygouris-Coe & Catherine Glass

Rationale:
"No comprehension activity has a longer or more pervasive tradition
than asking students questions about their reading, whether this occurs before,
during, or after reading (Duke & Pearson, 2002) Questioning has
long been used by teachers as a way to guide and monitor student learning. "Research
shows that teacher questioning strongly supports and advances students' learning
from reading (Armbruster, Lehr, & Osborn, 2001)." Questioning
is effective for improving comprehension because it gives
the students a purpose for reading, focuses attention on what must be learned,
helps develop active thinking while reading, helps monitor comprehension,
helps review content, and relates what is learned to what is already known
(Armbruster, Lehr, & Osborn, 2001). Research findings suggest that a
student's understanding and recall can be readily shaped by the types of
questions to which they become accustomed (Duke & Pearson, 2002) Therefore,
if inferential understanding is desired, a student's question answering behavior
can be shaped by the questions that require them to connect
information in the text to their knowledge base. In the state of Florida, the
FCAT Reading Test requires such inferential understanding of text.
Taffy Raphael spent time observing students and the strategies students employ while answering questions. She found that many students fell into one of two categories: (1) Those who relied only on their memory or prior knowledge to find answers or (2) those who relied only on the text. These observations revealed the importance of teaching students the relationships between questions and answers. As a result, Raphael (1986) developed an approach called QAR or Question-Answer-Relationships which teaches students how to distinguish questions with answers that are found "in the book" and questions with answers found "in my head." Raphael's (1986) research with QAR has proven that when students are taught to use the strategy their ability to answer questions correctly improves. Raphael also found that through QAR, students developed a language for talking about the strategies they use to answer questions.
Understanding
how Question-Answer-Relationships work is crucial for learning. Many
students are unaware of the different thinking levels questions
may elicit (Buehl, 2001). Students often times take a literal approach
to answering questions, searching for direct statements within the
text that answer the question. Many times they feel betrayed and give
up when they don't find an explicit answer. Other students rely solely
on what they already know regardless of the text. For these students,
answering questions becomes an exercise in common sense rather than
a thoughtful consideration of new information encountered in print
(Buehl, 2001). Question-Answer-Relationships help students to realize
the need to consider information in the text and information from their
own background knowledge (Raphael, 1986).
Raphael identified two categories of questions: those whose answers
are supplied by the author (in-the-book QARs) and those that
have answers that need to be developed based on the reader's ideas
and experiences (in-my-head QARs). These two categories of
questions also have two different types of questions.
In-the-book questions are classified as either Right
There questions or Think and Search
questions. The answer to Right There questions can be found in one sentence in the text. Students can point to these
answers. The answers to Think and Search questions are pieced together
using information from different parts of the text.
In-my-head questions are classified as either Author
and You questions or On My Own questions. The answer to Author
and You questions are
not found in the text. Instead they require students to think inferentially.
Students must think about what they already know, what the author is
telling them, and how both pieces of information fit together. On
My Own questions can be answered without even reading the text. The answers
to these questions rely solely on their own experiences.
| In-the-Book Questions | In-My-Head Questions |
|---|---|
Right There Questions![]() The answer is in the text. The words used to make up the question and words used to answer the question are found in the same sentence. |
Author and You Questions The answer is not in the story. You need to think about what you
already know, what the author tells you, and how it fits together. |
Think and Search The
answer is in the selection, but you need to put together different
pieces of information to find it. The answer comes from different
places in the selection. |
On My Own The answer is not in the text. You can
answer the question without even reading the text. The answer is
based solely on your own experiences and knowledge. |
(Information for chart from Santa, Havens, Valdes (2004)
How to Use the Strategy:
This is
intended as an introduction to the QAR technique. QAR takes time to
develop with students. Students will need a fair amount of instruction
and guided practice using QAR. The teacher should invest time in modeling
using think alouds when teaching students this strategy.
Teacher-directed whole-group instruction:
1. Explain the strategy. Explain to students
that there are essentially two categories of questions:
In
The Book: the answer can be found in the text. |
|---|
For each
category of questions there are two types of questions. (You can use
QAR posters to illustrate and highlight this information.)
| In The Book |
|
In My Head |
|
2.
Demonstrate the strategy. To teach this
strategy, teachers should use an example that clearly distinguishes
between the different types of questions. Demonstrate how you determine
question type. For in the book questions, show students how to find the
answers to the questions in the text. For in the head questions, demonstrate
the though processes used to answer these questions.
3. Guide students to apply the strategy. As a class, have students decide the QAR for each question and explain their reasoning. Discuss using the QAR strategy. The teacher should give students feedback on their use of the strategy. You can use the Modified QAR worksheet below to guide students in using the QAR strategy.
4. Practice
individually or in small groups. Divide students into
groups of three and have them practice using QARs. Students should
identify the QAR for each question and then give the answer. Students
can use the Modified QAR worksheet below to independently practice
using the QAR strategy.
5. Reflect. Discuss
the QAR technique and how it helps students to better understand the
text. Talk about which types of questions require the most thought
and how students identified the QAR. At this point, students can complete
a journal activity answering these two questions: How does understanding
the QAR strategy help you comprehend information? How can you apply
the strategy on your own?
You may
need to go through this routine a few times before students catch on
to the strategy. For those students who need additional work, you can
form small groups of students who need additional help using the QAR
strategy. It is important that students learn to generalize this strategy
across settings and see the value of the strategy when completing work
from other content areas.
Variations:
QARs do not have to be used exclusively with text. They can be used with
tables, graphs, pictures, music and art. Included in the resources is
a lesson plan for using QAR with pictures.
As students become comfortable with identifying types of questions and answering
them, students can begin writing examples of their own questions in lieu
of responding to your questions. Student-generated questions can be exchanged
with other classmates who then answer and classify the student-produced questions.
Teaching QAR is also an excellent way of preparing students to take standardized
assessments such as FCAT. See Duke and Ritchhart's online article No
Pain, High Gain.
Ideas
for Assessment:
Teachers
can use several different forms of assessment when evaluating the student's
ability to use QARs. Assessment can be done informally using anecdotal records
and observations. You can evaluate the student's understanding of
the QAR strategy by using comprehension sheets that are completed during
lessons and activities. Students can also write journal entries explaining
the QAR strategy and why or how it is helpful in comprehending what they
read.
Teachers can also use a rubric to assess student understanding of the QAR
strategy. The following rubric comes from a lesson plan found on www.readwritethink.org.
Criteria |
Points |
The
student accurately identifies each of the four question types
(1 point each) ___ Right There ___ Think & Search ___ On My Own ___ Author & Me |
|
| The
student's responses demonstrate a close, careful reading. (4
points) Notes: |
|
| The
student makes appropriate links to the text for "In the book"
questions. (4 points) Notes: |
|
| The
student makes approriate connections for "In my head" questions.
(4 points) Notes: |
|
| The
student demonstrates reflective reading habits during group conversation.
(4 points) Notes: |
(Click on the graphic above to go to a pdf file of the Modified QAR worksheet.)
The elementary example below used an FCAT sample passage for fourth grade - The Red Fox pg. 4-9.
(Click on the graphic above to go to a pdf file of a sample elementary Modified QAR worksheet.)
The secondary example below used an FCAT sample passage for ninth grade - Dive In! Careers in Oceanography.

(Click
on the graphic above to go to a pdf file of a sample secondary Modified
QAR worksheet.)
Resources
For more informative links on prediction strategies see the following:
QAR Handout
-
http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson232/question.pdf
Lesson Plan: Guiding Comprehension: Self-Questioning Using Question Answer
Relationships
http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=227
Lesson Plan: Using QARs to Develop Comprehension and Reflective Reading Habits
http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=232
Lesson Plan: Applying Question-Answer Relationships to Pictures
http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=370
Reading
Quest QAR Information
http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/go/readquest/strat/qar.html
The Winter, 2005 edition of the Project CRISS newsletter has additional
information on Question-Answer-Relationships
http://www.projectcriss.com/projectcriss/newsletters/comments.pdf
References
Armbruster, B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading
first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington,
DC: The U.S. Department of Education.
Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning,
2nd edition. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Duke, N. & Pearson, D. (2002), Effective practices for developing reading
comprehension. In Farstrup, A. & Samuels, S. (Ed.) What research has
to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, Delaware: International
Reading Association.
Duke, N. & Ritchhart (n.d.) No pain, high gain: Standardized test preparation. Retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://teacher.scholastic.com/professional/assessment/nopain.htm
Raphael,
T. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The
Reading Teacher (39) 6, 516-522.
Santa, C., Havens, L., Valdes, B. (2004). Project CRISS:
Creating independence for student-owned strategies. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt
Publishing Company.
.
![]() |
Go to Adobe PDF instruction page. |
Last Updated December 06, 2004
forpd@mail.ucf.edu | (866)
227-7261 (FL only)
FOR-PD is a project of the ITRC @ UCF College
of Education and administered
under a grant from the Florida
Department of Education and Just
Read, Florida!