FOR-PDs Reading Strategy of the Month

Rationale:
A high school, English language learner sits with a reading specialist going
over answers to questions his history teacher assigned. It is apparent that
the student did not gain the information he should have after reading the chapter.
He is unable to answer questions at the end of the chapter or answer questions
the reading specialist asks of him. Finally, she asks him to summarize a key
section of the text and he is unable to do so.
Teaching students with a wide range of abilities and needs
has always challenged teachers. Language is rapidly becoming an additional
form of diversity, and many teachers have little information or education
that focuses on assisting multilingual learners with their reading
(Fitzgerald & Graves, 2005). The main source of reading material
in the content area classroom is the textbook, however, many students,
including English language learners struggle to comprehend textbooks.
English language learners have the added challenge of learning, comprehending,
and applying the academic English used by teachers and textbooks.
Academic English is the “linguistic glue” that describes
content-area knowledge and procedures, expresses complex thinking
processes and abstract concepts, and creates cohesion and clarity
in written and oral discourse (Zwiers, 2004/05). Teachers must understand
how to teach strategies and deliver content to English language learners
in strategic ways that make the concepts comprehensible.
One such strategy that has proven effective as a study and reading strategy
is SQ4R – Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review,
Reflect. SQ4R provides a systematic way of comprehending and studying
text (Richardson & Morgan, 1997). Billmeyer and Barton (1998) suggest several
examples of how this strategy is used throughout the reading process. Students
preview text to develop predictions and set a purpose for reading by generating
questions about the topic. Students then read actively, searching for answers
to the questions they have generated. By summarizing information students are
able to monitor their own comprehension. Finally, students evaluate their comprehension
through review.
How
to Use the Strategy:
The teacher should model how to complete each step of the SQ4R strategy and
then move students into guided practice. Scaffolds such as posters and worksheets
can help students as they learn to implement this strategy.
SURVEY ![]() |
Students should skim and scan the chapter. The purpose of surveying the chapter is to get the general idea of the content, structure, organization, and plan of the chapter. Surveying the chapter gives the “big picture" - a framework of the main ideas, which will help to hold the details together later (Richardson & Morgan, 1997).
|
QUESTION ![]() |
Having students develop questions gives them a purpose for reading. Reading for specific purposes positively influences comprehension (Narvaez in Santa, Havens, and Valdes, 2004). Setting a purpose also aids the student in recalling information. Developing questions prior to reading results in spontaneous attempts to answer the questions based on information already known, increased concentration and attention while reading to find an answer to the question, and increased comprehension due to the mind in its attempt to find an answer to the question. Before beginning to read, students should turn each title and subtitle into a question. Practice will make this skill automatic (Richardson & Morgan). For example, if you’re reading part of a chapter called “Functions of the Spinal Cord,” ask yourself, “What are the functions of the spinal cord?”
|
READ ![]() |
Reading promotes an active search for answers to
the specific questions that students have developed. It forces
the student to concentrate for better comprehension and aids in
lengthening attention span (Richardson & Morgan, 1997).
|
RECITE ![]() |
This step encourages students to use their own
words and not simply copy from the book. This improves memory and
assures greater understanding (Richardson & Morgan, 1997). If students cannot answer a question, they may find that they need to revise their question. For example, you may have first posed the question, “What is the treaty of Versailles?” for the subtitle, “Treaty of Versailles.” After reading the section, you may find that your question was not answered or you may find that a better question would have been, “Why was the Treaty of Versailles created?” If changing the question doesn’t help clarify the reading, then it may be time to seek help.
|
REVIEW ![]() |
Teachers should include regular review periods
as an effective strategy for retaining information. Regular reviews
help students remember more of the information, thereby changing
the nature of studying done at exam time. Rather than relearning
material that has been forgotten because students haven’t
looked at it since reading it or writing it down, preparing for
an exam can include a review of familiar material and rehearsal
strategies like trying old exams. The volume of material to review
increases as the course continues, but the amount of time needed
to review older material decreases.
|
REFLECT ![]() |
Information from the entire chapter or article is linked together in the reflection phase. This step helps students clarify their thinking and focus understanding. By reflecting on the reading, students begin to think critically about what they have learned and have yet to learn about the topic. This type of critical thinking is necessary if students are to become mature readers. Reflecting on what has been read also helps students retain understanding for longer periods of time. The more students reflect on text the longer they will remember it and the more likely they will be able to use the knowledge they have retained (Richardson & Morgan, 1997). By having students reflect, knowledge is related in a meaningful way to what is already known so that it will be retained and becomes the basis for further learning. This process is called “reading beyond the lines” (Richardson & Morgan, 1997). The reader should attempt to develop insight into the topic and make associations among the important material noted while reading.
|
There are several variations to this particular study/reading strategy.
SQ3R |
SQ3R Worksheet Generator |
SRR |
|
PQ4R |
Six Steps for Reading and Studying Textbooks |
REAP |
Higher Order Literacy and REAP |
All are highly structured study and memory techniques, which help students, gain meaning from text.
Ideas for Assessment:
Teachers can use several different forms of assessment when evaluating the student’s use of this strategy. First, teachers can give students a learning strategies inventory, which is a quick way of gathering data on student strategy use. This inventory can be given before and after strategy instruction to see differences in student’s responses. Textbook assessments are another instrument that can be used with students. Given prior to and after teaching and using the strategy, the teacher can see the impact that the SQ4R method has had on student learning. After teaching the strategy, teachers can observe the students actual use of the strategy through observations and student think alouds. Finally, the SQ4R worksheet provides data on student use of the strategy. All of these assessments represent how students apply new strategy instruction in the content area. By using multiple data sources, the teacher is able to observe changes in students’ comprehension and retention of content area material. (Click on the graphic above to go to a pdf file of a blank
SQ4R worksheet)

(Click on the graphic above to go to a pdf file of an elementary example)

(Click on the graphic above to go to a pdf file of a secondary example)
Fitzgerald, J. and Graves, M. (2004/2005). Reading supports for all. Educational Leadership, 62 (4), p. 68-71.
Richardson, J. and Morgan, R. (1997). Reading to learn in
the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Santa, C., Havens, L. and Valdes, B. (2004) Project CRISS: Creating indenpendence
through student owned strategies. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishng
Company.
Zwiers, J. (2004/05). The third language of academic English. Educational Leadership, 62 (4), p. 60-63.
![]() |
Go to Adobe PDF instruction page. |
Last Updated December 06, 2004
forpd@mail.ucf.edu | (866)
227-7261 (FL only)
FOR-PD is a project of the ITRC @ UCF College
of Education and administered
under a grant from the Florida
Department of Education and Just
Read, Florida!